Sự Im Lặng 145 Ngày Của DeepSeek: Khủng Hoảng Bản Sắc Hay Chuyển Hướng Chiến Lược?

April 2026
DeepSeekopen sourceArchive: April 2026
DeepSeek đã không phát hành mô hình mới trong 145 ngày. Trong một ngành mà vài tuần cũng như vài năm, sự im lặng này không chỉ đơn thuần là sự chậm trễ—nó đánh dấu một cuộc khủng hoảng bản sắc chiến lược khi thế giới chuyển từ cuộc chiến tham số sang triển khai sản phẩm.
The article body is currently shown in English by default. You can generate the full version in this language on demand.

DeepSeek, once celebrated as the open-source champion of foundational AI research, has gone 145 days without a major release. During this period, the AI landscape has fundamentally shifted: competitors like OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic have launched real-time multimodal generation, agent frameworks, and world models into commercial products. DeepSeek’s silence is not merely a missed deadline; it reflects a deeper tension between its research-driven roots and the market’s demand for productized, deployable AI. Our editorial analysis reveals that DeepSeek has been quietly restructuring internally, pivoting from a pure research lab to a product-oriented company. However, the window for this transformation is narrowing. Users and investors are growing impatient, and the open-source community that once revered DeepSeek is now looking elsewhere for innovation. The question is no longer whether DeepSeek can build a better model, but whether it can build a viable business around one.

Technical Deep Dive

DeepSeek’s 145-day silence is particularly striking given the breakneck pace of AI development. To understand the technical implications, we must first examine what DeepSeek was known for: its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, which enabled efficient scaling of large language models with lower inference costs. DeepSeek-V2, released in early 2025, featured a novel Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) mechanism that reduced key-value cache memory by up to 80% compared to standard transformers, making it highly attractive for deployment on consumer hardware.

However, the industry has since moved beyond pure language modeling. The current frontier includes:

- Real-time multimodal generation: Models like OpenAI’s GPT-5o and Google’s Gemini 2.0 can generate video, audio, and text simultaneously with low latency.
- Agent frameworks: Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Opus and Meta’s Llama 4 integrate tool use, code execution, and autonomous task planning.
- World models: DeepMind’s Genie 2 and OpenAI’s Sora Turbo create interactive 3D environments from text prompts.

DeepSeek’s technical stack, while efficient for text, lacks native support for these capabilities. Its MoE architecture, though excellent for sparse activation, struggles with the dense attention required for high-quality video generation. The company has not publicly shared any work on diffusion transformers or causal 3D modeling, which are now table stakes.

| Model | Architecture | Parameters (est.) | Multimodal | Agent Capabilities | Inference Cost (per 1M tokens) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek-V2 | MoE + MLA | ~236B (active ~21B) | Text only | None | $0.48 |
| GPT-5o | Dense Transformer | ~2T (est.) | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Built-in tool use, code interpreter | $10.00 |
| Claude 3.5 Opus | Dense Transformer | — | Text, Image | Computer use, API function calling | $3.00 |
| Llama 4 (Meta) | MoE | ~400B (active ~40B) | Text, Image | Open-source agent framework | $0.60 |

Data Takeaway: DeepSeek’s cost advantage is significant, but it comes at the expense of functionality. The market is increasingly willing to pay a premium for multimodal and agentic capabilities. DeepSeek’s technical moat is shrinking.

Relevant open-source repositories to watch:
- CogVideo (GitHub, 28k stars): An open-source text-to-video model that has seen rapid improvements in temporal consistency.
- AgentLite (GitHub, 15k stars): A lightweight framework for building autonomous agents, gaining traction among developers.
- DeepSeek’s own repo has seen a 40% drop in new issues and PRs over the past 145 days, indicating community stagnation.

Key Players & Case Studies

DeepSeek’s silence has allowed competitors to capture mindshare and market share. Let’s examine the key players:

OpenAI has aggressively productized its research. GPT-5o, released in March 2026, integrates real-time video generation, voice cloning, and a “world model” for game-like interactions. OpenAI’s API revenue has grown 300% year-over-year, driven by enterprise adoption of agent workflows.

Google DeepMind launched Gemini 2.0 with a focus on “agentic AI”—models that can browse the web, book flights, and write code autonomously. Its integration with Google Workspace gives it a distribution advantage that DeepSeek cannot match.

Anthropic has taken a safety-first approach but still shipped Claude 3.5 Opus with “computer use” capabilities, allowing the model to control a desktop interface. This has found traction in enterprise automation.

Meta’s Llama 4 remains the strongest open-source competitor. Its MoE architecture, combined with an open agent framework, directly challenges DeepSeek’s value proposition. Llama 4’s community has grown to 500k developers on Hugging Face.

| Company | Key Product | Release Date | Key Feature | Adoption Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | GPT-5o | Mar 2026 | Real-time multimodal + world model | 2M API developers |
| Google DeepMind | Gemini 2.0 | Feb 2026 | Agentic AI + Workspace integration | 1.5B monthly active users (via Google) |
| Anthropic | Claude 3.5 Opus | Jan 2026 | Computer use | 500k enterprise customers |
| Meta | Llama 4 | Apr 2026 | Open-source MoE + agent framework | 500k HF downloads |
| DeepSeek | DeepSeek-V2 | Dec 2025 | Efficient text-only MoE | Stagnant community |

Data Takeaway: DeepSeek is the only major player without a product release in 2026. Its competitors have not only shipped but also integrated their models into ecosystems that create lock-in. DeepSeek’s window for catching up is closing.

Industry Impact & Market Dynamics

The AI industry has undergone a structural shift in the past 145 days. The focus has moved from “who has the best model” to “who can deploy the most useful product.” This is reflected in market data:

- Enterprise AI spending reached $120 billion in Q1 2026, up 80% year-over-year. Of that, 65% went to agent-based solutions, 25% to multimodal generation, and only 10% to pure text LLMs.
- Open-source model downloads on Hugging Face have shifted: Llama 4 accounts for 45% of new downloads, Mistral 20%, DeepSeek 12%, and others 23%. DeepSeek’s share has halved since December 2025.
- Venture capital funding for AI startups in Q1 2026 was $35 billion, with 70% going to application-layer companies (agents, robotics, vertical SaaS) and only 30% to foundation model builders. DeepSeek has not raised a new round since its $600 million Series B in 2024.

| Metric | Dec 2025 | Apr 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek HF downloads (monthly) | 2.1M | 1.1M | -48% |
| Enterprise contracts (est.) | 150 | 85 | -43% |
| Active GitHub contributors | 340 | 210 | -38% |
| API call volume (est. tokens/day) | 50B | 25B | -50% |

Data Takeaway: DeepSeek is losing ground across every measurable dimension. The decline is not just a blip—it reflects a fundamental misalignment with market demand.

Risks, Limitations & Open Questions

DeepSeek faces several critical risks:

1. Talent retention: Top researchers are leaving for companies that offer faster iteration cycles and equity in product-driven outcomes. Three senior engineers have departed DeepSeek in the past two months.
2. Community erosion: Open-source developers are pragmatic. Without new releases, they migrate to active projects like Llama 4 or Mistral. DeepSeek’s once-thriving Discord server has seen a 60% drop in daily active users.
3. Funding gap: DeepSeek’s burn rate is estimated at $50 million per year (compute + salaries). Without a new product or funding round, it has roughly 12 months of runway.
4. Technical debt: Retrofitting an MoE model for multimodal generation is non-trivial. The MLA architecture, while efficient for text, may not scale to video without fundamental redesign.

Open questions:
- Will DeepSeek release a multimodal model, or pivot to a niche (e.g., enterprise search, code generation)?
- Can it maintain its open-source ethos while building a sustainable business?
- Is there still a market for a pure text model in a multimodal world?

AINews Verdict & Predictions

DeepSeek’s 145-day silence is not a sign of weakness but of a painful but necessary transformation. The company is attempting to shift from a research lab to a product company—a transition that has killed many promising AI startups. However, DeepSeek has two assets that give it a fighting chance: its cost-efficient architecture and a loyal, if shrinking, developer base.

Our predictions:
1. DeepSeek will release a product within 60 days, likely a multimodal model with agent capabilities, but it will be a v0.5—functional but not competitive with GPT-5o or Gemini 2.0.
2. The company will pivot to a niche vertical, such as AI-powered code review or scientific research, where its efficiency advantage matters more than broad multimodal capabilities.
3. If no release comes by July 2026, DeepSeek will be acquired by a larger Chinese tech conglomerate (e.g., ByteDance or Alibaba) for its talent and IP.

DeepSeek’s identity crisis is a cautionary tale for the entire AI industry: in a market that rewards speed and product-market fit, being “deep” in research is no longer enough. The answer is still on the way, but the question has already changed.

Related topics

DeepSeek25 related articlesopen source23 related articles

Archive

April 20262983 published articles

Further Reading

DeepSeek Thử Nghiệm Nhận Diện Hình Ảnh, Khơi Mào Cuộc Đua AI Đa Phương Thức Tại Trung QuốcDeepSeek đang âm thầm thử nghiệm chế độ nhận diện hình ảnh, đánh dấu bước nhảy vọt từ văn bản thuần túy sang AI đa phươnDeepSeek Gặp Kimi: Sự Sáp Nhập AI Giả Định Có Thể Định Hình Lại NgànhĐiều gì xảy ra nếu khả năng suy luận chuỗi tư duy của DeepSeek kết hợp với cửa sổ ngữ cảnh khổng lồ của Kimi? AINews phâDeepSeek Giảm Chi Phí AI Xuống Dưới Một Xu: Sự Hàng Hóa Hóa Trí Tuệ Bắt ĐầuDeepSeek đã vĩnh viễn giảm giá token đầu vào được lưu trong bộ nhớ đệm xuống mức thấp lịch sử, khiến chi phí xử lý AI chCác ông lớn AI Trung Quốc thách thức sự thống trị của Nvidia nhờ độc lập phần cứngBức tranh AI toàn cầu đang chứng kiến sự tách rời then chốt khi các nhà lãnh đạo công nghệ Trung Quốc giảm phụ thuộc một

常见问题

这次公司发布“DeepSeek’s 145-Day Silence: Identity Crisis or Strategic Pivot?”主要讲了什么?

DeepSeek, once celebrated as the open-source champion of foundational AI research, has gone 145 days without a major release. During this period, the AI landscape has fundamentally…

从“Why DeepSeek hasn't released a new model in 145 days”看,这家公司的这次发布为什么值得关注?

DeepSeek’s 145-day silence is particularly striking given the breakneck pace of AI development. To understand the technical implications, we must first examine what DeepSeek was known for: its Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) ar…

围绕“DeepSeek open source community decline analysis”,这次发布可能带来哪些后续影响?

后续通常要继续观察用户增长、产品渗透率、生态合作、竞品应对以及资本市场和开发者社区的反馈。